Economic recommendations for reseeding wheat crops

Authors

  • Thomas Newton Martin Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Author
  • Luis Antonio Saccol Fros Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Author
  • Ubirajara Russi Nunes Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Author
  • Enio Marchesan Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Author
  • Jessica Deolinda Leivas Stecca Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Author
  • Vinicius dos Santos Cunha Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i3.28714

Keywords:

Triticum aestivum L., economic analysis, plants stand

Abstract

There are several factors that may compromise the initial establishment of wheat crops, reduce the plant populations, and consequently affect yield components and grain yield. The objective of this study was to produce reseeding recommendations for wheat crops affected by reduced plant stands based on an economic analysis of the yield cost and the expectation of financial return. Experiments were conducted during two agricultural years (2011 and 2012) in the Experimental da Coxilha area, which belongs to the Department of Plant Science of Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). Random removals of wheat plants were undertaken, corresponding to 0, 20, 40, and 60% of the initial population of plants for the following cultivars: Fundacep Horizonte, Marfim, Fundacep Campo Real, Mirante and Quartzo. The characteristics that were evaluated included the number of plants and ears, as well as the grain yield. The Fundacep Horizonte, Marfim and Fundacep Campo Real cultivars were stable and able to compensate for losses caused by reductions in the plant stands. The yield production of Mirante and Quartz cultivars was dependent on the number of established plants and therefore relied on good establishment of the initial crop and no subsequent losses. Thus, the findings of this study indicate that the Mirante and Quartz cultivars do not compensate for reductions in plant populations and need to be reseeded if the number of plants is not appropriate. In such cases, the economic viability of reseeding can be quantified. In contrast, the Fundacep Horizonte, Marfim, and Fundacep Campo Real cultivars are more stable, and reseeding is not economically justified at these locations.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Thomas Newton Martin, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
    Eng. Agrônomo  Prof. Dr. UFSM
  • Luis Antonio Saccol Fros, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
    Eng. Agronomo.
  • Ubirajara Russi Nunes, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
    Eng. Agr. Prof. Dr. UFSM
  • Enio Marchesan, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
    Eng. Agrônomo Prof. Dr.
  • Jessica Deolinda Leivas Stecca, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
    Eng. Agro.
  • Vinicius dos Santos Cunha, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
    Eng Agronomo Mestre

Downloads

Published

2016-06-24

Issue

Section

Crop Production

How to Cite

Economic recommendations for reseeding wheat crops. (2016). Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 38(3), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i3.28714

Similar Articles

1-10 of 929

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>