Permanent health education as a possible practice: an experience in primary care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v21i0.59584Keywords:
Health policy, Education, Health human resource training, Primary health careAbstract
Objective: to describe the process of needs analysis, execution and evaluation of an educational program in Primary Health Care, in the logic of Permanent Health Education (PHE). Method: action research with mixed approach, developed between 2014 and 2016, with health workers. Data collection occurred in focus group meetings, educational program workshops and questionnaire application. The qualitative data were submitted to discourse analysis of the collective subject, and quantitative data were submitted to descriptive statistical analysis. Results: the prioritized need was impaired communication in the work environment; and, during the implementation of the educational programme, participants agreed agreements to overcome the identified problems, such as the creation of dialogue spaces and defined communication flows. They were satisfied to participate, and it was noticed that the educational program had a positive impact on the work. Final considerations: the objective of describing the entire Process of PHE was achieved. There was a greater stimulus for a movement of transformation in the work process, in reference to the improvement of communication in the professional dimension of care management, from a dialogical and critical paradigm, capable of resignifying the teaching-learning process at work. As a product, there is a more effective way to operate PHE.
Downloads
References
2. Demo G, Fenelon L, Costa AC, Watanabe EAM. Práticas de envolvimento produzem colaboradores resilientes? Mediação da identidade organizacional. R. Adm. FACES Journal. 2019; 18(3):27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21714/1984-6975FACES2019V18N3ART6472
3. Mohindra R. Value, values and valued: a tripod for organizational ethics. J Med Ethics [Internet]. 2022; 48: 154-159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106837
4. Leite CM, Pinto ICM, Fagundes TLQ. Educação permanente em saúde: reprodução ou contra- hegemonia? Trabalho, Educação e Saúde [online]. 2020; 18(suppl 1): e0025082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00250
5. Lemos CLS. Educação Permanente em Saúde no Brasil: educação ou gerenciamento permanente? Ciênc. Saúde Colet. 2016; 21(3):913-922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015213.08182015
6. Ferreira L, Barbosa JSA, Esposti CDD, Cruz MM. Permanent Health Education in primary care: an integrative review of literature. Saúde em Debate [online]. 2019; 43(120): 223-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201912017
7. Cecilio LCO. The death of Ivan Ilyich, by Leo Tolstoy: points to be considered regarding the multiple dimensions of healthcare management. Interface comum. Saúde educ. 2009; 13(supl.1):545-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832009000500007
8. Araújo, MCSQ, Abbad GS, Freitas TR. Avaliação qualitativa de treinamento. Rev. psicol. organ. trab. 2017; 17(3):171-79. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2017.3.13089
9. Peduzzi M, Agreli HLF, Silva JAM, Souza HS. Trabalho em equipe: uma revisita ao conceito e a seus desdobramentos no trabalho interprofissional. Trab. educ. saúde .2020; 8(supl.1): e0024678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00246
10. Previato GF, BadisseraVDA. A comunicação na perspectiva dialógica da prática interprofissional colaborativa em saúde na Atenção primária à Saúde. Interface comum. Saúde educ. 2018; 22(supl22): 1535-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622017.0647
11. Massaroli A, et al. Estratégias educativas na promoção da comunicação segura: Relato de experiência. Ciênc. Cuid. saúde. 2021; 20: e50596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v20i0.50596
12. Vasconcelos MN, Silva LMS, Queiroz MVO, Moreira TMM, Sousa GJB, Pereira MLD. Avanços e desafios das políticas públicas de gestão das tecnologias em saúde nas américas: scoping review. Cienc Cuid Saude. 2021; 20:e58609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v20i0.58609
13. Uchida TH, Mitsue F, Umeda JE, Higasi MS, Caldarelli PG. Percepção de profissionais de saúde sobre utilização de tecnologias de informação e comunicação. Rev. Sustinere. 2020; 8(1): 4-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/sustinere.2020.51280
14. Maaitah RA, AbuAlRub RF. Exploration of priority actions for strengthening the role of nurses in achieving universal health coverage. Rev. latinoam. enferm. 2017; 25: e2819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1696.2819
15. Koerich C, Erdmann AL, Lanzoni GMM. Interação profissional na gestão da tríade: educação permanente em saúde, segurança do paciente e qualidade. Rev. latinoam. enferm. 2020; 28: e3379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4154.3379
16. Bell BS, Tannenbaum SI, Ford JK, Noe RA, Kraiger K. 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. J Appl Psychol. 2017; 102(3):305-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000142
17. Araujo MCSQ, Abbad GS, Freitas TR Evaluation of learning, reaction and impact of corporate training at work. Psicol. teor. pesqui. 2019; 35: e35511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e35511
