Comparison between two methods for determination of mechanical power in vertical jumping - doi: 10.4025/reveducfis.v23i2.15018

Authors

  • Jorge Luiz Storniolo Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Author
  • Gabriela Fischer Universidade de Verona - ITA Author
  • Leonardo Alexandre Tartaruga Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Author

Keywords:

Mechanical power, Vertical jump, Fatigue.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical power values of vertical jumps measured by BOSCO test (Theoretical Power, PT) with mechanical power values registered by force plate (Experimen Power, PE) and verify the agreement between the two methods. Eleven recreational runners performed continuous maximal jumps for 60 seconds. Force platform 3D and 2D kinematics system were used for calculation of PT and PE, respectively.  Data about flight time and number of hops were obtained from the kinematic analysis (Dvideow 5.0). We used Bland & Altman for agreement between the methods. The average values of PT and PE were 15.6 ±2.4 W.kg-1 and 20.8 ±3.2 W.kg-1, respectively, ranging from the agreement limits ±2 s.d.  Therefore, the equation of the PT is a convenient method for determining the mechanical power during continuous vertical jumps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Jorge Luiz Storniolo, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
    Educação física (áreas da locomoção humana e treinamento esportivo).
  • Gabriela Fischer, Universidade de Verona - ITA
    Educação física (locomoção humana, treinamento esportivo).
  • Leonardo Alexandre Tartaruga, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
    Educação física (mecânica e energética da corrida)

Published

2012-07-25

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Comparison between two methods for determination of mechanical power in vertical jumping - doi: 10.4025/reveducfis.v23i2.15018. JPhysEduc (Maringá) [Internet]. 2012 Jul. 25 [cited 2026 Jun. 7];23(2):261-70. Available from: https://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/15018